Est. Market Value (AVM)
$926,000
Range $799K - $1054K
| Comp (Listing) | SqFt | Price | $/SF | Dist | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 380 Dearborn St, Pasadena, CA 91104 2/1 | 1244 | $1,015,000 | $816 | 0.31 mi | 99% |
| 466 Wickliffe Dr, Pasadena, CA 91104 2/1 | 1305 | $799,000 | $612 | 0.07 mi | 99% |
| 1166 N El Molino Ave, Pasadena, CA 91104 2/1 | 1232 | $1,150,000 | $933 | 0.64 mi | 99% |
| 535 E Howard St, Pasadena, CA 91104 2/1 | 1108 | $775,000 | $699 | 0.17 mi | 98% |
| 1374 Palm Ter, Pasadena, CA 91104 2/1 | 1138 | $998,000 | $877 | 0.44 mi | 98% |
| 1191 Sunset Ave, Pasadena, CA 91103 2/1 | 1204 | $820,000 | $681 | 1.07 mi | 98% |
| Scenario | Prob | Apprec | Exit | 5-yr IRR | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure Growth | 20% | 5.5%/yr | $1,210,245 | 4.7% | ACCEPTABLE |
| Stable Market | 45% | 3.0%/yr | $1,073,488 | -3.9% | CAUTION |
| Slower Economy | 25% | 1.0%/yr | $973,235 | -12.5% | CAUTION |
| Stress Scenario | 10% | -2.0%/yr | $837,031 | -32.7% | CAUTION |
| Strategy | Return/yr | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-Term Hold + Rental Income ✓ BEST Score 4.8/10, 5-yr return -3.9%; best path if buyer absorbs negative carry and targets 7+ yr hold for apprec. + equity buildup. · Equity grows 82.6% over 5 years ($231.5k → $422.8k) via principal paydown; long-term apprec. (3% base case) supports eventual refinance or sale. · Requires robust reserves ($30k–$50k minimum) and realistic rent growth assumptions (3–4% annually) to reach break-even and positive IRR by year 7–8. | -3.9% | Medium | 4.8 |
| Short-Term Rental (STR) Score 3.4/10, 5-yr return -5.3% (vs. -3.9% long-hold); underperforms due to management overhead, vacancy risk, and local STR regulation risk. · Nightly STR rent ($115–$130 imputed from annual $3,470 market rent) insufficient to cover debt service ($146/day) after cleaning, platform fees, insurance. · Not recommended unless property is in high-tourist area or owner can command $150+/night (no evidence in Pasadena data). | -5.3% | Medium | 3.4 |
| Buy, Improve & Refinance Score 3.4/10, 5-yr return -1.6%; improves modestly vs. pure hold via strategic reno, but net improvement only 2.3% (−1.6% vs. −3.9%). · Assumes $15k–$30k cosmetic upgrade yields $400–$600/mo rent growth; refi at improved appraisal extracts partial equity. Tight margins for effort. · Viable only if purchase price drops to $800k and buyer secures portfolio lender willing to refi after 12-month seasoning. | -1.6% | Medium | 3.4 |
| BRRRR Strategy Score 2.8/10, 5-yr return -1.6%; similar math to Buy/Improve/Refi but requires full rehab ($40k–$60k+) to reach rental optimization target. · 1926 vintage property on 5,035 sqft lot suggests mechanical/structural deferred maintenance risk; full rehab budgets often exceed $75k for vintage homes. · Not recommended unless structural inspection confirms low rehab cost AND purchase price ≤$750k (leaves refi headroom). | -1.6% | Medium | 2.8 |
| Fix & Flip Score 2.5/10, 5-yr return −57.5% (severe loss); high holding cost (6–9 mo carry on 6.58% debt) + reno risk + market timing risk overwhelm appreciation. · Flip profit requires 15–20% ARV upside. Pasadena median appreciation 3%/yr ≈ 7.5% over 2.5 years. Reno + carrying costs (15%–20% of ARV) exceed gains. · Strongly not recommended unless buyer owns general contractor license, project management expertise, and access to off-market discounted inventory. | -57.5% | High | 2.5 |